One way to factor binomials is by searching for the greatest common factor.
Consider
(5x * 25)
In this case the greatest common factor is 5 and the phrase can be written as
5(x*5)
Showing posts with label greatest common divisor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label greatest common divisor. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Friday, December 12, 2008
Prove for natural numbers a and b, the greatest common divisor of a and b may be written as a linear combination of a and b.
Prove for natural numbers a and b, the greatest common divisor of a and b may be written as a linear combination of a and b. Or if d is the greatest common divisor of a and b GCD(a,b) there exist integers x and y such that
ax+ by = d
Let C be a set defined by z where z=ax+by for some integers x and y, and z is greater than 0. C is in the natural numbers and has a smallest element. m such that m=ax(0)+by(0). No we see that m < = a and m < = b because a(1) + b(0) and a(0) + b(1) are also in C. We will show that m=d. Since d divides a and d divides b, d divides ax(0) + by(0). Thus d divides m. Therefore d < = m.
Now the proof by contradiction...
suppose m does not divide a. Then by the division algorithm we proved yesterday there exist natural numbers q and r such that a=mq+r, where 0 < style="color: rgb(204, 0, 0);">m= ax(0) + by(0)
mq = aqx(0) + bqy(0)
a -r =aqx(0) + bqy(0)
r = a - aqx(0) - bqy(0)
r = a(1-qx(0) + b(-qy(0))
So r is a linear combination of a and b, so r is in our first set C. But r < style="color: rgb(204, 153, 51);">m < = d and as we proved earlier d <= m so d = m , so d (the GCD) can be written as a linear combination of a and b.
ax+ by = d
Let C be a set defined by z where z=ax+by for some integers x and y, and z is greater than 0. C is in the natural numbers and has a smallest element. m such that m=ax(0)+by(0). No we see that m < = a and m < = b because a(1) + b(0) and a(0) + b(1) are also in C. We will show that m=d. Since d divides a and d divides b, d divides ax(0) + by(0). Thus d divides m. Therefore d < = m.
Now the proof by contradiction...
suppose m does not divide a. Then by the division algorithm we proved yesterday there exist natural numbers q and r such that a=mq+r, where 0 < style="color: rgb(204, 0, 0);">m= ax(0) + by(0)
mq = aqx(0) + bqy(0)
a -r =aqx(0) + bqy(0)
r = a - aqx(0) - bqy(0)
r = a(1-qx(0) + b(-qy(0))
So r is a linear combination of a and b, so r is in our first set C. But r < style="color: rgb(204, 153, 51);">m < = d and as we proved earlier d <= m so d = m , so d (the GCD) can be written as a linear combination of a and b.
Sunday, November 23, 2008
Let d be the greatest common divisor of two positive integers a and b. If c is a positive integer such that c divides a ,and c divides b, then c <= d
Let d be the greatest common divisor of two positive integers a and b. Prove if c is a positive integer such that c divides a ,and c divides b, then c <= d.
This is a somewhat simple proof since it uses the definition of a greatest common divisor.
A greatest common divisor (GCD) is the largest integer which divides two other integers. Take for example the numbers 24 and 16. 8 is the GCD for 24 and 16 since 8 is the largest number that will divide both of them.
So if the GCD=d then d divides a, and d divides b.
The numbers 4 and 2 also divide 24 and 16, but are not the "Greatest". However, we do see that 4 and 2 also divide 8, which is the second part of the definition of a GCD.
For every positive integer c, if c divides a and c divides b, then c divides d.
It is this last part of the definition we will use for our proof. If c is an integer which divides a and b, then by definition c must also divide the GCD, which is d. And therefore c < d. ~~~~
This is a somewhat simple proof since it uses the definition of a greatest common divisor.
A greatest common divisor (GCD) is the largest integer which divides two other integers. Take for example the numbers 24 and 16. 8 is the GCD for 24 and 16 since 8 is the largest number that will divide both of them.
So if the GCD=d then d divides a, and d divides b.
The numbers 4 and 2 also divide 24 and 16, but are not the "Greatest". However, we do see that 4 and 2 also divide 8, which is the second part of the definition of a GCD.
For every positive integer c, if c divides a and c divides b, then c divides d.
It is this last part of the definition we will use for our proof. If c is an integer which divides a and b, then by definition c must also divide the GCD, which is d. And therefore c < d. ~~~~
Saturday, November 22, 2008
Prove if c divides a and c divides b, then c divides any combination an+bm, where n and m are integers
Prove if c divides a and c divides b, then c divides any combination an+bm, where n and m are integers.
Since c divides both a and b then there must exist integers j and t such that a=cj and b=ct.
So by substitution into an+bm we get
an+bm = (cj)n+(ct)m = c (jn + tm). So c divides (an + bm) ~~~~
Thus, if c divides a and b, then c also divides any multiple of a and b.
Since c divides both a and b then there must exist integers j and t such that a=cj and b=ct.
So by substitution into an+bm we get
an+bm = (cj)n+(ct)m = c (jn + tm). So c divides (an + bm) ~~~~
Thus, if c divides a and b, then c also divides any multiple of a and b.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
